Music Download Inconsistency Syndrome (MDIS), and "The Cure"
In my quest to figure out which site had the album for the best price, I began to wonder - why should the price vary at all? Shouldn't I just be able to go to my preferred store, buy the album download, and know I didn't get ripped off? There aren't any costs associated with shipping and shelving physical products here.
No you can't, and this appears to have something to do with ill-conceived price manipulation on the part of the music industry to 'level the playing field' for other music download retailers. But it's really just leveling my willingness to commit to a purchase. Here's are the confusing price variations I found when looking for that new album:
| Album in question: The Cure, 4:13 Dream | |||
| iTunes | Amazon.com | Walmart.com | |
| Cost for album | $9.99 | $8.99 | $9.22 |
| Cost per track | $0.99 | $0.99 | $0.94 |
| Format | AAC | MP3 | MP3 |
| DRM? | Yes | No** | No** |
| Quality*** | Medium | High | High |
| Album savings | $2.88 | $3.88 | $3.00 |
For this particular album, it looks like Amazon is the way to go - but that isn't the case for every album. And what if I only want a few tracks? Anyway, it seems disingenuous that Apple supposedly had to threaten to close down the iTunes store to keep the per-track price of music downloads from going up - only to then see Walmart launch weeks later with tracks for as little as $0.74+. And now that other stores offer DRM-free MP3s, why isn't all new music on iTunes offered in a $0.99/track iTunes Plus format? Anyway, sorry for the particularly geeky rant - but come on, you aren't going to win the war on illegal downloads with these kinds of consumer unfriendly strategies.
*not an "iTunes Plus" offering
**Amazon tags it's MP3s with a unique ID code in the metadata, Walmart - unknown
***iTunes Protected AAC is 128kpbs, MP3s can be VBR but approx. twice the bit rate of protected AAC





